Issue In Health Policy And Management Essay

Presentation The component of prosperity is a characteristic worry for the entire of humankind. It includes the support of a parity, inside that person, with their individual being and with nature. The essential job of the individual’s wellbeing anyway is of outrageous significance. The onlooker of human services refrains clinical consideration. Medicinal services alludes to the avoidance, cure and treatment of disease and the maintaining of mental and physical height through the administrations of the unified organizations incorporate social protection, which is an administration undertaking for the oppressed, harmed, matured or even jobless populace. A pool of commitments from managers and furthermore government salary finances social protection. Human services likewise incorporates clinical guide, and is a government state financed program that profits social insurance structure the destitute. Essential human services is the part of expert medicinal services benefited to the patients or upset from the start contact with the social insurance framework. Clinical consideration or Medicare is a protection area of social insurance for the matured, concentrating on the over the age of 65, that is subsidized and overseen by the government framework. Though clinical consideration is devoted to serving a given age, medicinal services is a wide segment (that additionally incorporates clinical consideration). The connection between Health care, and the underlying foundations of our social feelings; Cultural feelings, existing as moral and social qualities direct the setting inside which frameworks work. Common qualities like the extraordinary stewardship for protecting the holiness of life and the Hippocratic vow impact human services colossally. The relationship of human services and other society requests makes another arrangement of qualities I. e.availing customers their regard, top notch administration, arrangement and great incentive for cash while expending worker securely, decency and a delicate framework (to their predicament) they can be glad for. † Religion; basically otherworldliness includes all the more so in issues of medicinal services. Take the case of the Salvation Army development on the blood transfusion banter. Some different religions won't permit the joining of tissue from others other than the patient. Obliging medicinal services effort to the ideal of subject, as specialists and attendants will not perform clinical techniques because of their own convictions. Dr. Saha Somnath in the investigation of the â€Å"Relevance of Cultural Distance among Patients and Physicians to Racial Disparities in Health care† predicts that; â€Å"patients detailed better relationship when seeing doctors of their own ethnicity or race. † clarifies the social racial variations in human services. Official SUMMARY As routed to the medicinal services discussion, in May 1998 by Daniel Yankelovich† Americans have grasped a growing pluralism of gatherings, perspectives, perspectives, subcultures and qualities. † That as the world changes and more up to date frameworks are grasped its essential that our social qualities which simultaneously sway on the economy and profound (conviction) creatures be on an offset with the wellbeing strategy we seek after. References 1. Harold G. , A diverse Dialog On Healthcare Ethics, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1999, USA. 2. Lee G. , A Cross Cultural Analysis of Values and Political Economy Issues. Greenwood/Praeger 1994, USA. 3. Susan H. , Religions, Culture and Healthcare: A down to earth handbook for use in Healthcare Enviroments, Radcliffe Publishing, 2006.

Summary Chapter 1 Johnson, Whittington Scholes Essays

Synopsis Chapter 1 Johnson, Whittington Scholes Essays Synopsis Chapter 1 Johnson, Whittington Scholes Essay Synopsis Chapter 1 Johnson, Whittington Scholes Essay Johnson, Scholes Whittington †Exploring Strategy, content and cases Chapter 1 †Introducing Strategy Defining procedure Strategy is about the key issues for the fate of associations, or as it were, the drawn out heading for an association. The depiction of technique in the book has two favorable circumstances: 1. It can incorporate conscious, legitimate system and gradual, developing examples of methodology; 2. It can lay the emphasis on contrasts and rivalry just as on perceiving the jobs of collaboration and impersonation. The long haul: As procedures are regularly estimated over years or even decennia, the significance of methodology is huge. This can be effectively clarified in the ‘Three Horizons Framework’. The Three Horizons Framework is a figure which focuses on an organization to excist out of three organizations or exercises, these are characterized by skylines. (figure 1) Horizon 1: Basically the present center exercises of an organization. Skyline 2: Where organizations are making additional opportunities to pick up benefit. Figure 1. The three skylines structure Horizon 3: Were an organization make practical choices, where nothing is certain. For instance, innovative work undertaking and start-up adventures. Can't foresee what is coming. In short it very well may be said that organizations should concentrate on the drawn out system rather than just on the transient issues. The key heading: Strategies follow consistently a sort of way or example. In this way, systems are set by long haul targets. The vast majority of the occasions, the destinations are set so as to expand greatest benefit for the partners. The association: Organizations include extraordinary, complex associations with investors. These are inner just as outer. * Management is a basic factor in setting up and executing a methodology. Levels of procedure There are three degrees of system 1. Corporate level methodology: Has to do with the general extent of the organization and how worth is added to the entire association. 2. Business level procedure: How an organization ought to contend in its particular market. Additionally called a serious procedure. 3. Operational procedures: is about how various units of an organization executes the business and corporate methodology as to the assets, procedures and individuals. Defintions Strategy articulation: is the outline of the methodology, ought to be short. Likewise it should comprise of parts, for example, objectives, degree, exercises and favorable circumstances. Degree: Consists of clients or customers; geological area; degree of inside exercises (vertical mix) Advantage: How the organization will accomplish the targets which are set for itself in the picked space. Crucial: would we like to be. Vision:How would we like to accomplish this. Objectives:What do we need to accomplish in the coming time frame. Parts of procedure: There are three fundamental braches: 1. System setting: Internal and outside setting of associations. Inquires about the business investigation, social analysi and the asset based view. 2. Technique content: Concerns substance of various procedures and their degree of progress. Examines the decisions and exhibitions of various procedures. 3. System process: concentrates how techniques are framed and actualized. Investigates the vital arranging, decisions and changes and methodology as-practice. * Studying technique includes various types of points of view, for example, mental, social and financial perspectives. The investigating system model: This model analyzes the comprehension of the key situation of an organization (the specific circumstance); evaluating the vital decisions for the future (the substance) and oversees methodology in real life (process). The key position: Worried about the effect of methodology of the outside condition, the company’s vital capacity, the objectives of the organization and the organizations culture. 1. The earth: is chiefly concentrating on circumstances and dangers which are accessible in the earth where the organization is working in. 2. Key capacity: is made up about an organizations assets, for example, machines. Its capabilities are for instance specialized and administrative aptitudes. 3. Vital reason: each organization has its own strategic, and targets. What they are for the most part concentrating on is the thing that an organization needs to accomplish later on. . Culture: Organizational societies may be significant for an organization, as it can impact the methodology. In this manner, it is essential to realize how a culture can shape technique. The key decisions: Examines the alternatives as far as heading (in which the procedure may move) and the strategies (which the technique may persue). 1. Busine ss procedure: additionally called serious methodology. How an organization looks to go up against different organizations. 2. Corporate technique broadening: the portfolio scope, or at the end of the day, which organizations ought to be remembered for this portfolio. Enhancement in for the most part about the scope of items and markets. 3. Worldwide procedure: type of separation and in which universal markets an organization could contend. testing. 4. Development business enterprise: so as to endure, an organization should be creative consistently. Enterprise, or any type of it, is in this manner likewise a sort of development. 5. Obtaining collusions: Mainly about broadening an organization and in what direction this ought to be actualized. By purchasing another organization, partner or to go it exclusively. The system in real life: How a system is shaped and applied. 1. Vital assessment: When vital choices have been set it is essential to check whether they are applicable. Subsequently, a few variables ought to be remembered, for example, reasonableness, worthiness and possibility. 2. Key improvement process: what sort of arranging procedure should an organization have. 3. Sorting out: When a system is set, association is crucial so as to actualize it. 4. Authority and key change: Managing includes administration and change. This is significant as we live in a unique world. 5. Key practice: Who does what in the key procedure. * Issues with respect to the investigating methodology model: Small organizations Multinational partnerships Public divisions and not-for-benefits organizations The system focal points Ways of taking a gander at key issues contrastingly so as to create numerous bits of knowledge. * Strategy as configuration: arranging and examining * Strategy as experience: Strategy affected by understanding of administrators * Strategy as variety:Initiatives, assorted variety and new alternatives * Strategy as talk: * The focal points supports the investigation of alternate points of view.

Deep Breaths

Deep Breaths Ive been reading a lot of the comments about the applications that are due on Jan. 1. And while what Ill say now is just my opinion: CHILLAX Definition (source bryan.mitblogs.com) chill ·ax: /t??læks/ : -verb to calm down; to release oneself from inhibition, worry, tension, etc. I agree that it is easier said than done, but Im in the same boat as you right now. Im about to submit the application to my top choice graduate school, and there are a million questions running through my head, but I got hit by a jolt of admissions reality just now. 1. The deadline means as much as Im afraid to press the submit button, in order to have my application read, I have to press it. 2. I dont own a time machine to go back in time and correct mistakes or retake tests. 3. A little bit of faith and optimism can go a long way. 4. Ive tried my hardest, and thats all I can ask for. Dont start the new year stressed out about applications. Put your best foot forward heading into 2007. I can try to respond to any logistical/last minute questions you may have, but Ill only be near my computer for a little while longer before I head out myself to treat myself to some sushi and then celebrate the arrival of 2007. Happy New Year and Good Luck!

Deep Breaths

Deep Breaths Ive been reading a lot of the comments about the applications that are due on Jan. 1. And while what Ill say now is just my opinion: CHILLAX Definition (source bryan.mitblogs.com) chill ·ax: /t??læks/ : -verb to calm down; to release oneself from inhibition, worry, tension, etc. I agree that it is easier said than done, but Im in the same boat as you right now. Im about to submit the application to my top choice graduate school, and there are a million questions running through my head, but I got hit by a jolt of admissions reality just now. 1. The deadline means as much as Im afraid to press the submit button, in order to have my application read, I have to press it. 2. I dont own a time machine to go back in time and correct mistakes or retake tests. 3. A little bit of faith and optimism can go a long way. 4. Ive tried my hardest, and thats all I can ask for. Dont start the new year stressed out about applications. Put your best foot forward heading into 2007. I can try to respond to any logistical/last minute questions you may have, but Ill only be near my computer for a little while longer before I head out myself to treat myself to some sushi and then celebrate the arrival of 2007. Happy New Year and Good Luck!

Democracy and Bureaucrary Are Incompatible - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1846 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/09/19 Category Politics Essay Type Argumentative essay Tags: Bureaucracy Essay Population Essay Did you like this example? DEMOCRACY AND BUREAUCRARY ARE INCOMPATIBLE, DISCUSS USING ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES. The relationship between democracy and bureaucracy has generated much debate amongst scholars. Democracy is defined as a political system which supplies regular constitutional opportunities for changing the governing officials and the social mechanism which permits the largest possible part of the population to influence major decisions by choosing among political contenders for political office. Abraham Lincoln as cited in Haralambos and Holborn (1995) defines democracy as the government of the people by the people and for the people. Bureaucracy is defined by Schaefer (2003) as a component of formal organisation in which rules and hierarchal ranking are used to achieve efficiency. The focus of this discussion is to reflect to a greater extent the incompatibility that exist between democracy and bureaucracy Democracy emanated from western countries as a movement that clamoured for equality, f reedom of speech and expression. It came into being mainly after Second World War where many peoples rights were stripped off. Democracy came to restore individual dignity and popular participation. Decision making under the banner of democracy would mean that all involved parties should have informed consent on issues that directly affected them. Bureaucracy is a brain child of Weber who asserts that it’s an organised way of running an organisation. An organisation contains structures which should be followed in their order of importance. This means that, in decision making, relevant authorities should make decisions and in the event that they feel incapacitated to do that, they approach a higher office. There is chain of command and top down approach in communication which represents a hierarchy of authority. Haralambos and Holborn(1995), People in this hierarchy are paid and are full time officials who form a chain of command. A bureaucracy is concerned with business of administration with controlling, managing and coordinating a complex series of tasks. Bureaucracy represents oligarchy, rationality and separation of ownership from control. Democracy and bureaucracy coexist in society but their compatibility is questionable, they seem to be two conflicting views which exist in one society. The conflict perspective theorists are of the view that bureaucracy and democracy are much incompatible. Bureaucracy is inevitably a representative of the interest of the minority which is a direct opposition of democracy, which focus on majority rule and freedom of all. Bureaucracy state apparatus can be viewed as a specific creation of capitalist society with the roles of manipulating and turning the majority into proletariats. Lenin, as cited by Haralambos and Holborn (1995), clearly puts that western parliaments where â€Å"mere talking shops† while the real work of government was conducted behind closed doors by the state governing bureaucra cy therefore the state is an organ of class rule, an organ for the oppression of one class by another and hence cannot operate hand in glove with democracy. Hopes for truly democratic organisations in a communist society can be dismissed as mere illusions. According to Robert Michels 1876-1936 as cited in Haralambos and Holborn(1995), in his study of European socialist parties and trade unions, the organisations which had the aim to overthrow the capitalist state and create a socialist society based on democratic principles was not the resemblance of what actual happened. It was a mere duplication of the capitalist bureaucracy which is not very compatible with democracy. As supported by Jonson (1989) socialist states like the former Soviet Union, the state power was used to maintain wealth, power of government and military leaders at the expense of the wishes of the people, there was basic conflict between government and the people thereby compromising on democracy. Just like in the authoritarian capitalists government the state supports the interests of capitalists irregardless of having formal positions in government, all this suppress the will of the people. Therefore, bureaucracy is not compatible with democracy in such governments where the wishes of the people do not take paramount importance. It can be argued that organisation or bureaucracy is death knell of democracy and hence not compatible. Moreso, direct participation by large number of people in the running of an organisation is in practice impossible. Apart from the practical difficulties of assembling thousands of people, direct involvement in decision making will be more cumbersome and time consuming that nothing will get done. Since direct democracy is impractical, it can only be replaced by a form of some representative system, whereby delegates represent the mass and carry out its will. Hurd et al (1991) laments that these political elected leaders want to amass wealth at the exp ense of the people, just because of their positions. Leaders at the highest authority of the bureaucracy can appoint other leaders on basis of ethnic background, nepotism and favour hence the wishes of the people wont be respected because the leaders would be representing their own selfish needs. As a result, bureaucracy can not be compatible with democracy if the wishes of the majority are ignored. The only thing they will do is to come back with feedback and alerting the mass on their course of action in the future. For example the president went to represent Zimbabwe to the UN summit recently and told the Zimbabwe’s story without prior consultation with the people because of the hindrance caused by bureaucracy. The effective operation of the organisation requires a specialised division of labour that necessitates control and coordination from the top. The result is rigorously defined and hierarchical bureaucracy. Haralambos and Holborn (1995), postulate that the organis ation grows and administrative duties proliferate that it is no longer possible to take them at a glance. They become increasingly incomprehensible to those without special knowledge and training. Faced with this complexity, members of trade unions and political parties leave matters to their political leaders. Decisions are taken by the executive committees within the bureaucracy rather than by assemblies of the rank and the file. Thus, the very organisation which was created to represent its members, end up by largely excluding them from participation and decision making. Organisations therefore inevitably produce oligarchy which rule by a small group or elite, popularly known as the iron law of oligarchy. To sum up on oligarchy, Michels postulates that the oligarchic structure of the building suffocates basic democratic principle. Hence democracy and bureaucracy is not compatible because of these misgivings between the two. Communication in bureaucracy is basically top down commanding orders and giving institutions to employees or people without prior consultation. There is over dependence on the orders and direction for superiors while crushing the initiative of the subordinates. Macionis (1995) argues that individuality is suppressed as bureaucratic slavishly follow official procedures and regulations with advancement dependent on the judgement of higher authority. Subordinates bore and scrap to their superiors while adopting an arrogance stance to those beneath them in the hierarchy. Bureaucracy therefore, is sworn enemy of individual liberty and all bold initiative in matter of internal policy. It is petty, narrow, rigid and illiberal hence reflects the direct opposite of democracy and thereby it’s not compatible. There is a tendency to displace organisational goals by the leadership in bureaucracy. The leadership is established at the top of the bureaucratic pyramid and its primary concern is the maintenance of its own power. Leaders wish to retain the privilege and status which their positions bring, a concern which take priority over the started goals of the organisations. Schaefer (1995) adds that the organisation will become increasingly conservative as leaders refrain from taking any action that might endanger their position thereby compromising democracy in the process. Leaders learn skills like the art of controlling meetings, of applying and interpreting rules, of proposing motions at opportune moments, their control over the publications of the party for instance enables them to put across their own view point. Moreso in bureaucracy, leaders have considerable say in the appointment of officials in the organisation and can therefore select those who support their policies thus leaders see their own interests and the maintenance of the organisation as indistinguishable. Organisation was essential to democracy, however as a matter of technical and practical necessity organisations adopt a bureaucrat ic structure and it produced oligarchy control which brings to an end or death of democracy. However to a very lesser extent compatibility between democracy and bureaucracy do exist. Haralambos and Holborn (1993) assert that democracy is inconceivable without organisations. In a modern complex society the only way individuals can effectively communicate their wishes and press their nterests is by joining together and forming an organisation. This is particularly true of the relatively powerless working class masses for whom combination and cooperation is necessary and in Zimbabwe we have the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) which is rooted on democratic foundations is now a full blown democratic bureaucratic political party. The inevitability on the compatibility of democracy and bureaucracy can be explained on psychological perspective on the natural need of the masses to be led. Macionis (1989) argues that democracy is a system in which power is exercised by the people as w hole, of which it does not mean that every member of society participates directly in decisions that directly affect them. This would only be possible in a very small political entity, hence representative democratic systems places governance in the hands of elected leaders. This is accompanying of veneration of activities where the masses clamoured to have a leader. In the light of democracy this will be viewed as the wish of the majority to be lead and hence can be respected. At the end of the day the leader will put in place a structure that resembles bureaucracy but all is done in the name of democracy. Therefore it can be argued that there is no bureaucracy without democracy and no democracy and bureaucracy without democracy. In other instances like in modern democracies people show their wishes through casting their vote in a free and fair electoral environment and if everyone including the observers view it as free and fair it becomes democratic because the wishes of the p eople will have been respected. The people would have given legal authority to the person and the voted government to rule over them hence it will be democratic, in this case democracy and burecracy becomes very compatible. Conclusively democracy and bureaucracy seem to be enemies which coexist in one society or in one organisation. In most case the two different aspects are not compatible as discussed but in other instances their coexistence is accepted as democratic and the only way forward in modern governments which involve managing larger populations which cannot be brought together at once and who have very diverse social economic views. If the majority agree then it’s viewed as democracy. The various interpretations of democracy lead to this debate on this compatibility. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Haralambos, M and Holborn, M (1995), Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. 4th edition. Harper Collins Publishers. London. 2. Hurd g et al (1991) Human Societies. An introduction to Sociology, Routledge and Kegan Paul . New York. 3. Jonson A, G (1981) Human Arrangements. An introduction to Sociology, Harcourt Braces Jovanovich. New York. 4. Macionis, J. J (1989) Sociology, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 5. Schaefer, R. T (2003) Sociology, McGraw Hill, New York. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Democracy and Bureaucrary Are Incompatible" essay for you Create order

Mothers Day Haha no Hi

May 10th is Mothers Day (Haha no hi). Although Happy ~ can be translated as ~ omedetou, there is no Japanese equivalent of Happy Mothers Day. Sending a Mothers Day card is not too common in Japan, but giving flowers (especially carnations) is a popular thing to do. I am very close with my mom. She is very open-minded and has been very supportive of whatever I have done. Since hugging parents (except by children) is not a common practice in Japan, I sometime wonder if words are enough to show love. Besides, I feel a little embarrassed to express my feelings in front of her, but I always appreciate her open-mindedness. Japanese Translation æ ¯ Ã£  ®Ã¦â€" ¥ ä ºâ€Ã¦Å"ˆå  Ã¦â€" ¥Ã£  ¯Ã¦ ¯ Ã£  ®Ã¦â€" ¥Ã£  §Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€šÃ¨â€¹ ±Ã¨ ªÅ¾Ã£  ®Happy ~㠁 ¯Ã£â‚¬ Ã£ Å Ã£â€š Ã£  §Ã£  ¨Ã£ â€ Ã£  ¨Ã¨ ¨ ³Ã£ â€¢Ã£â€šÅ'る㠁“㠁 ¨Ã£â€šâ€šÃ£ â€šÃ£â€šÅ Ã£  ¾Ã£ â„¢Ã£ Å'〠Ã¦â€" ¥Ã¦Å" ¬Ã¨ ªÅ¾Ã£  §Happy Mothers Day㠁 «Ã¥â‚¬ ¤Ã£ â„¢Ã£â€šâ€¹Ã¨ ¨â‚¬Ã¨â€˜â€°Ã£  ¯Ã£ â€šÃ£â€šÅ Ã£  ¾Ã£ â€ºÃ£â€šâ€œÃ£â‚¬â€šÃ¦â€" ¥Ã¦Å" ¬Ã£  §Ã£  ¯Ã¦ ¯ Ã£  ®Ã¦â€" ¥Ã£  «Ã£â€š «Ã£Æ' ¼Ã£Æ'‰ã‚’è ´Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹Ã£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£  ¯Ã£ â€šÃ£  ¾Ã£â€šÅ Ã¨ ¡Å'ã‚ Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 ¾Ã£ â€ºÃ£â€šâ€œÃ£ Å'〠Ã¨Å  ±Ã§â€° ¹Ã£  «Ã£â€š «Ã£Æ' ¼Ã£Æ' Ã£Æ' ¼Ã£â€š ·Ã£Æ' §Ã£Æ' ³Ã£ Å'æ ¯ Ã£  ®Ã¦â€" ¥Ã£  ®Ã¨Å  ±Ã£  ¨Ã£ â€¢Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 ¦Ã£ â€žÃ£  ¾Ã£ â„¢Ã£â€šâ€™Ã¨ ´Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹Ã£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£  ¯Ã¤ ¸â‚¬Ã¨Ë† ¬Ã§Å¡â€žÃ£  §Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€šÃ§ § Ã£  ¯Ã¦ ¯ Ã£  ¨Ã£  ¨Ã£  ¦Ã£â€šâ€šÃ¤ » ²Ã£ Å'㠁„㠁„㠁 §Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€šÃ¦ ¯ Ã£  ¯Ã£  ©Ã£â€šâ€œÃ£  ªÃ£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£  «Ã£â€šâ€šÃ¥  Ã¨ ¦â€¹Ã£ Å'㠁 ªÃ£  Ã£â‚¬ Ã§ § Ã£ Å'㠁™ã‚⠀¹Ã£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£  «Ã£  ¯Ã£ â€žÃ£  ¤Ã£  §Ã£â€šâ€šÃ§ â€ Ã¨ § £Ã£â€šâ€™Ã§ ¤ ºÃ£ â€"㠁 ¦Ã£  Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 ¾Ã£ â€"㠁Ÿã€‚è ¦ ªÃ£â€šâ€™Ã¦Å  ±Ã£  Ã£ â€"ã‚ Ã£â€šâ€¹Ã£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£  ¯Ã¥ ­ Ã¤ ¾â€ºÃ¤ » ¥Ã¥ ¤â€"æâ€" ¥Ã¦Å" ¬Ã£  «Ã£  ¯Ã£  ªÃ£ â€žÃ§ ¿â€™Ã¦â€¦ £Ã£  ªÃ£  ®Ã£  §Ã£â‚¬ Ã¨ ¨â‚¬Ã¨â€˜â€°Ã£   Ã£ â€˜Ã£  §Ã¥  Ã¥Ë†â€ Ã£  «Ã¦â€žâ€ºÃ¦Æ'…㠁 ¯Ã¤ ¼ Ã£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹Ã£  ®Ã£ â€¹Ã£  ªÃ£  ¨Ã¦â‚¬ Ã£ â€ Ã£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£â€šâ€šÃ£ â€šÃ£â€šÅ Ã£  ¾Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€šÃ£  Ã£  ®Ã£ â€ Ã£ Ë†Ã§ § Ã£  ¯Ã©  ¢Ã£  ¨Ã¥ â€˜Ã£ â€¹Ã£  £Ã£  ¦Ã¦â€žÅ¸Ã¨ ¬ Ã£  ®Ã¦ °â€"æÅ' Ã£  ¡Ã£â€šâ€™Ã¨ ¡ ¨Ã£ â„¢Ã£ â€œÃ£  ¨Ã£  «Ã£â‚¬ Ã¥ °â€˜Ã£ â€"ç… §Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 Ã£ â€¢Ã£ â€¢Ã£â€šâ€šÃ¦â€žÅ¸Ã£ ËœÃ£â€šâ€¹Ã£  ®Ã£  §Ã£ â„¢Ã£ Å'〠Ã¦ ¯ Ã£  ®Ã¥ ¯â€ºÃ¥ ¤ §Ã£ â€¢Ã£â‚¬ Ã§ â€ Ã¨ § £Ã¥Å â€ºÃ£â€šâ€™Ã£  ¨Ã£  ¦Ã£â€šâ€šÃ£ â€šÃ£â€šÅ Ã£ Å'㠁Ÿã  Ã¦â‚¬ Ã£  £Ã£  ¦Ã£ â€žÃ£  ¾Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€šÃ£ Å Ã¦ ¯ Ã£ â€¢Ã£â€šâ€œÃ£â‚¬ Ã£ â€žÃ£  ¤Ã£â€šâ€šÃ£ â€šÃ£â€šÅ  Ã£ Å'㠁 ¨Ã£ â€ Ã£â‚¬â€š Romaji Translation Go-gatsu tooka wa haha no hi desu. Eigo no Happy~ wa, ~omedetou to yakusareru koto mo arimasu ga, nihongo de Happy Mothers Day ni ataisuru kotoba wa arimasen. Nihon dewa haha no hi ni kaado o okuru koto wa amari okonawaremasen ga, hana (toku ni kaaneeshon ga haha no hi no hana to sareteimasu) o okuru koto wa ippanteki desu. Watashi wa haha to totemo naka ga ii desu. Haha wa donna koto nimo henken ga naku, watashi ga suru koto niwa itsudemo rikai o shimeshite kuremashita. Oya o dakishimeru koto wa (kodomo igai) nihon niwa nai shuukan nanode, kotoba dake de juubun ni aijou wa tsutawaru no kana to omou koto mo arimasu. Sonoue watashi wa men to mukatte kansha no kimochi o arawasu koto ni, sukoshi terekusasa mo kanjiru no desu ga, haha no kandaisa, rikairyoku o totemo arigataku omotte imasu. Okaasan, itsumo arigatou! Note: The translation is not always literal. Beginners Phrases I am very close with my mom. Watashi wa haha to totemo naka ga ii desu.ã‚ Ã£ Å¸Ã£ â€"㠁 ¯ 㠁 ¯Ã£  ¯Ã£  ¨ 㠁 ¨Ã£  ¦Ã£â€šâ€š 㠁 ªÃ£ â€¹Ã£ Å' 㠁„㠁„ 㠁 §Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€šÃ§ § Ã£  ¯Ã¦ ¯ Ã£  ¨Ã£  ¨Ã£  ¦Ã£â€šâ€šÃ¤ » ²Ã£ Å'㠁„㠁„㠁 §Ã£ â„¢Ã£â‚¬â€š

Miranda is the Only Woman in William Shakespeare’s Play,...

In William Shakespeare’s The Tempest, there has been much debate on whether Miranda, the only female in the play, is a fully formed character or merely an object being used by the men of the play. William Shakespeare wrote in a time where men were considered the dominant sex and women were only used for reproduction and maternal purposes. In the Tempest men like Prospero and Antonio are shown in a position of power and strength, while Miranda is associated with frailty and innocence. This allows the men to use Miranda for their own selfish purposes. However Miranda is unaware of this and acts independently and doesn’t always abide to what the men of the play force her to do. Miranda’s actions throughout the Tempest portray her as a fully formed character but as she is the only other female character in the play, the men view her as an object which can be used to suit their needs. Miranda’s actions are her own in the Tempest as we see in Act 1 Scene ii - th e first time we are introduced to Miranda - where Miranda begs her father, Prospero not to harm any of the survivors from the Tempest. She talks with sympathy in her voice: â€Å"O, I have suffer’d/ with those that I saw suffer! A brave vessel/ who had, no doubt, some noble creature in her/ dash’d all to pieces† (1, 2, 5 – 6). Miranda is brave enough to stand up to her father knowing that he has the power to harm the sailors. She shows empathy and care not only for the sailors who she has never met before but for the ship